Sunday, April 1, 2012

Lawyer: Islamic Group not linked to armed gangster

Published: March. 31, 2012 at 6: 50 PM

Paris, March 31 (UPI)--the lawyer of the leader of an Islamic group arrested by French authorities said the Group has no connection with the Toulouse shooter who killed seven people.

Lawyer Philippe Missamou, who Forsane Alizza leader Mohammed Achamlane, one of the 19 people arrested Friday for alleged links to radical Islam represents, said Saturday denied that the Group Achamlane had something to do with the murders, CNN reported Muhammad Merah.

Merah killed the week before a Rabbi, the spiritual of two children and another school girl outside a Jewish school last week and three paratroopers of North African descent.

Merah reportedly admitted to the shooting during a two-day standoff with police at his apartment in Toulouse before he was killed in an exchange of gunfire.

CNN said French media reports have suggested that Merah Forsane Alizza, who had links to followers in Toulouse.

French Ministry of Home Affairs said "19 arrests were made in connection with the Group Forsane Alizza" Friday in Toulouse, Marseille, Nantes, Lyon and the Ile de France region, around Paris.

Interior Minister Claude Gueant said five rifles, four automatic weapons, three Kalashnikov rifles and a bulletproof vest were found in searches of the suspects ' houses.

Forsane Alizza Missamou said that achamlane said that did not support the armed struggle. The lawyer said that the Group was not dangerous but worked on battle injustice against Muslims in France.


View the original article here

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies - Insurance Daily

AppId is over the quota
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Lawyer: French arrests misdirected

AppId is over the quota
Mohammed Merah killed seven people in a series of attacks.Mohammed Merah doodde zeven mensen in een serie van aanvallen.Nieuw: Advocaat: De Forsane Alizza groep wil bescherming van de rechten van moslims in van FranceThe islamitische groep leider zegt het had geen contact met schutter Merah, zijn advocaat says19 vermoedelijke leden van de groep Forsane Alizza vrijdag werden gearresteerd, saidPolice autoriteiten hebben onderzocht of Merah, verweten 7 dood, handelde alleen

Parijs (CNN) - de leider van een islamitische groep waarvan de leden in een aantal Franse politie-invallen waren gericht ontkent elk contact met Toulouse schutter Mohammed Merah, advocaat Philippe Missamou zei zaterdag.

De leider van de Forsane Alizza groep, Mohammed Achamlane, was een van de 19 mensen vrijdag gearresteerd over vermeende verbindingen met radicale Islam, zei Missamou.

De invallen kwam een week na Merah, die zeven mensen in een serie van aanvallen gedood, dood na een lange belegering in de zuidwestelijke stad van Toulouse werd neergeschoten.

Franse media rapporten dat voorgestelde Merah had verbindingen met de pro-al Qaeda groep, die een cluster van volgelingen in Toulouse heeft ontwikkeld.

Forsane Alizza werd verboden in januari voor bemoedigend Franse burgers om te reizen naar Afghanistan te vechten jihad.

Missamou vertelde CNN dat had hij laatst gesproken met Achamlane op maandag.

Op dit moment vertelde hem Achamlane dat de groep niet had contact met Merah, en dat het had niets te maken met de Merah moorden in Toulouse, zei Missamou.

Achamlane zei dat de groep heeft geen ondersteuning voor gewapende strijd, zei de advocaat.

Missamou verwacht te worden toegestaan om te voldoen aan met leden van de groep, die hij heeft vertegenwoordigd sinds januari, op maandag of dinsdag.

Na dat zal zij worden gezet voordat een rechter en hetzij onder met kosten in afwachting van verder onderzoek geplaatst, of vrijgegeven, zei hij.

Missamou betwist van het ministerie van binnenlandse zaken claim dat alle 19 mensen gearresteerd leden van Forsane Alizza zijn, zeggen dat verschillende werden niet.

Vrijdag de arrestaties vonden plaats in Toulouse, Marseille, Nantes, Lyon en de regio Ile de France, rond Parijs, zei het ministerie van binnenlandse zaken.

Van het ministerie media office zei: "de politie had plannen om 19 arrestaties verrichten, en daarom 19 arrestaties werden gemaakt in verband met de groep Forsane Alizza."

Minister van binnenlandse zaken Claude Gueant zei dat verschillende vuurwapens, waaronder vijf geweren, vier automatische wapens en drie kalasjnikovs, had gevonden in zoekopdrachten van de verdachten huizen, evenals een kogelvrij vest.

Missamou zei dat hij had geen informatie over de vorderingen die vuurwapens werden gevonden.

Hij zei ook hij wist niet weten of de leden van de groep tijd in Pakistan of Afghanistan doorgebracht hebben.

De advocaat geschillen de karakterisering van de groep als gevaarlijk, zeggen dat het werkt aan wedstrijd waargenomen onrecht van de Franse staat.

Haar leden beweren dat Frankrijk niet herkent de multiculturele, multiraciale en multireligieuze aard van het land, en passeert wetten die gericht zijn op moslims in Frankrijk, zei hij.

Politie hebben onderzocht of Merah alleen handelde in de planning zijn aanvallen.

Hij is de schuld van de moord op drie Franse parachutisten, een rabbijn en drie Joodse kinderen leeftijden 4, 5 en 7. Twee andere mensen raakten ernstig gewond in de schietpartij.

Merah vertelde politie hij had deelgenomen aan een trainingskamp van al-Qaeda tijdens een bezoek aan Afghanistan en Pakistan, volgens Parijs aanklager Francois Molins.

Maar zijn oom, Jamal Azizi, geweigerd verklaringen door de Franse autoriteiten dat Merah was een sympathisant van al-Qaeda en dat hij was gereisd naar Afghanistan of Pakistan trein naar wapens gebruiken.

Merah werd donderdag begraven op een begraafplaats buiten Toulouse.

CNN's Anna Prichard bijgedragen aan dit verslag.

ADVERTISEMENTbijgewerkt 9: 12 AM EDT, vr 23 maart 2012 Franse inlichtingendiensten miste vitale aanwijzingen zoals Mohammed Merah tekenen van groeiende radicalisering toonde? 12: 11 PM EDT, do, 22 maart 2012 bijgewerkt de Toulouse schietpartijen herori?nteren angsten op opgeleide aanvallers die zijn bepaald, legaal wonen in het westen en operationele alone.updated 7: 38 AM EDT, do, 22 maart 2012 'Lone wolves' die plot te verrichten aan kleinschalige aanvallen op zachte doelen zou de toekomst van het terrorisme, een beveiliging deskundige warns.updated 10: 32 AM EDT, vr 23 maart2012 Mohammed Merah, beschreven als een zelfbenoemde al Qaeda jihadistische, werd genoemd als de belangrijkste verdachte in een reeks van dodelijke shootings.updated 12: 08 PM EDT, do, 22 maart 2012 CNN onderzoekt of de aanpak van de crisis een invloed op de presidenti?le poll.updated zijn zal 6: 30 PM EDT, di maart 20, 2012 In de roze-hued straten van Toulouse, France's 'Ville Rose"vlaggen vliegen op halfstok: de stad is in rouw-- en schok. 12: 08 AM EDT, di maart 20, 2012 bijgewerkt de stad Toulouse is bij de hoogste veiligheid alarmniveau, nadat een leraar en drie kinderen werden neergeschoten op een joodse school.updated 7: 51 PM EDT, Mon maart 19, 2012 Agnes Poirier, een politiek commentator, praat over het ongeloof in Frankrijk na de dodelijke drive-by shooting in een school in Toulouse.updated 6: 06 AM EDTDo, 22 maart 2012 uit nergens een straatrover verscheen in de binnenplaats van een joodse school in de Franse stad net als studenten voor 's morgens klassen aankomen waren.Meest populaire verhalen nuADVERTISEMENT

View the original article here

Lawyer says U.S. blocks investigation of Afghan massacre

SEATTLE (Reuters)-the defense of the U.S. soldier accused of murdering 17 Afghan citizens lawyer claims US authorities blocking its ability to investigate the incident.

John Henry Browne, Staff Sergeant Robert Balen's lawyer, said the American troops in Afghanistan have prevented his team interviewing wounded civilians in a hospital in Kandahar, and are allowing other potential witnesses to spread, making it difficult to detect them.

"My stomach is the reason is that they don't have much of a case," said Browne at a press conference in his Office in downtown Seattle on Friday.

Bales last week was formally charged with the murder of eight adults and nine children in a pre-dawn shooting rampage in southern Afghanistan on 11 March, which further eroded U.S.-Afghan relations already strained by a decade of war.

He could face the death penalty if convicted.

No date has been set for a process, but U.S. military prosecutors are putting together their case while Browne prepares his defense.

Browne said he has a team of researchers in Afghanistan now, but they are little cooperation of military prosecutors who receive the cost posted.

"We are faced with an almost complete information from the Government, that blackout a devastating effect on our ability to investigate the charges preferred against our client," he said in a statement released earlier on Friday.

A reliable account of the events of the night of the massacre is not yet revealed. A recent report indicated Afghan villagers doubt Bales acted alone. Other reports suggest Bales left his base twice during the night.

"I do not believe that that is the case, but we cannot say that for sure," Browne said on Friday.

Browne said that his researchers had spoken to American soldiers in Afghanistan, but had not can contact any witnesses.

"If we tried to treat wounded civilians in Kandahar hospital we were refused entry and told to coordinate with the prosecution team interview," said Browne in the earlier statement.

"The next day the prosecution team interviewed citizens injured. We discovered shortly after the interviews of the persecution of the wounded civilians that the citizens were all released from the hospital and there was no contact information for them. " That means that potential witnesses could prove unattainable, will scatter and Browne said.

Browne said it was too early to say whether his defence would rely on post traumatic stress disorder, PTSD or other psychiatric problems that Bale may have suffered as a defense against the charges.

The next step in the case of balen-which is held in a military detention center at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas-undergo a mental assessment by army doctors independent of both the prosecution and defense, to determine whether he fits passive process, known as a "mental health board ' in the army. That could take several months, said Browne.

After that has occurred, the military justice system requires a first hearing, known as an "article 32" hearing, to determine if there is a strong enough case to proceed to a court martial.

(Reporting by Bill Rigby; Editing by Todd Eastham and Paul Sim?o)


View the original article here

Lawyer-entrepreneur-candidate was really none of those

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

CLAYTON ? On the surface, Dustin C. Mitchell, Esq., seems like a solid candidate for the cover of a glossy business magazine.

A quick Internet search describes a millionaire entrepreneur heading several private companies, a lawyer who graduated from Washington University's law school and a political insider staging a run for lieutenant governor of Missouri.

His appearances in St. Louis County Circuit Court several times earlier this year, representing two men in four cases ranging from assault to driving while intoxicated, would seem to support that professional image. He even handed out business cards in the courthouse, promoting his legal practice and his range of courtroom experience.

But most of Mitchell's public persona appears false. Court records instead reveal a convicted felon with a trail of trouble and dubious claims. Authorities say he isn't a lawyer, and earlier this month charged him with one felony count of stealing by deceit for allegedly taking money to represent a St. Louis County man in court.

In that case, police say, he received $1,000 from the man and represented him on charges of drunken driving and speeding, and in a hearing to revoke that man's probation for an earlier crime.

If convicted, Mitchell, 31, faces up to seven years in prison. A grand jury will review the cases and consider additional charges, officials said.

In one of the other four cases, Mitchell represented an Arnold man accused of attacking a hospital security guard, court records show. In January, Mitchell persuaded a judge to reduce the bail and release the man from jail.

Authorities haven't seen that client since Mitchell was arrested. A judge issued a new warrant for the man's arrest, but police were still looking for him.

'MAKING A MESS'

Mitchell was tripped up when he represented himself in a small-claims lawsuit, said Paul Fox, St. Louis County's director of judicial administration. A limousine company had sued Mitchell, claiming he failed to pay more than $800 for driving him around in September.

Although he didn't need a lawyer to represent himself in the small-claims case, he claimed to be one and listed a bar number — a lawyer's license number — on court paperwork. A clerk entering the number into a computer system discovered the number wasn't Mitchell's.

"The bar number is what gave him away, and it just kind of snowballed from there," Fox said.

Meanwhile, court clerks reported seeing Mitchell in the courthouse passing out business cards that identified him as an attorney with "Berkshire King Mitchell & Sottile, PC," Fox said. Authorities couldn't find a law firm by that name. The card also lists two websites, both of which appear to be inactive.

Fox had Mitchell's picture posted with security guards at the St. Louis County Courthouse, but in a way, Mitchell turned himself in. On Feb. 29, he called the courthouse looking for a lost wallet and was told to come by to see whether it was there.

Police met Mitchell at the security checkpoint to arrest him. He was later released on bail but returned to prison to face a parole board hearing on whether to revoke probation.

In a brief telephone interview, Mitchell admitted he had represented people in court without a law license but denied taking money.

"I wanted to do my best to help," he told a reporter.

His explanations were vague.

"I have no intention of practicing law in this state, otherwise I would take the bar," he said. "Had the entire process gone through, they would have gotten off with probation. I know what I'm doing."

After his arrest, Mitchell withdrew from three of the four criminal cases, admitting in court documents that he was not licensed to practice law in Missouri. A judge removed him in the fourth case.

The two men Mitchell sought to defend could not be reached for comment.

Mitchell took advantage of the abundance of lawyers at the courthouse to blend in with the crowd, Fox said.

"We have six to seven thousand lawyers in St. Louis County, and we're seeing new ones all the time," he said.

A lawyer himself, Fox said he has never seen a situation like Mitchell's in three decades of practice.

"He was making a mess," Fox said. "Very few people have this kind of nerve."

LEGAL TANGLES

Mitchell is from Rolla, Mo., where he attended high school and found controversy early on. The Rolla School District suspended Mitchell in 1999 for comments he made in an online forum about the Columbine High School shootings. The American Civil Liberties Union represented Mitchell in a suit alleging his free speech rights were violated, and the two sides reached a settlement.

After living in Washington state for a time, he came to the St. Louis area, where he briefly ran Outlook Magazine, a publication for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender residents. The magazine folded several years ago.

Later, Mitchell took over as manager of a cabinet business in St. Louis. The company closed in 2008 amid legal troubles. The same year, an employee there accused Mitchell of opening credit card accounts listing her as the guarantor, according to police reports. When he didn't pay, banks came after her, she told police. Officers sought charges, but prosecutors declined to file them, saying there wasn't enough evidence.

In 2005, an intoxicated Mitchell knocked on the locked doors of an Alton McDonald's in the middle of the night, waving handcuffs and claiming he was a federal agent, according to police reports. He was charged with impersonating a law enforcement officer, but the case was dismissed in 2009 because Mitchell never showed up for court and police couldn't find him.

The same year, he went to prison in Missouri for about eight months after his third DWI conviction. Mitchell also has convictions for writing bad checks and stealing a credit card from a customer at a Red Robin restaurant in Des Peres, where he worked as a server.

'OUTSTANDING CLAIMS'

Mitchell is mum about his legal troubles online. On Facebook, he describes a "high-octane" lifestyle and calls himself "one of the most ambitious, outgoing and dedicated" entrepreneurs of the era.

A résumé on LinkedIn, a professional networking website, says Mitchell graduated from Washington State University and earned a law degree from Washington University in St. Louis. But officials at each university said they had no records of a Dustin Mitchell ever attending the school.

Mitchell acknowledged he was aware of the LinkedIn profile but said he did not "maintain" it.

Mitchell portrays himself as a savvy political insider. The online résumé says Dustin Mitchell worked for U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., and Mitchell told the limo driver who later sued him that he had ties to Sarah Steelman, a Republican running for U.S. senator. A spokeswoman for Foxx said Mitchell never worked there. The Steelman campaign said the candidate did once meet with Mitchell, but the campaign soon thereafter tried to distance itself from him.

"We did ask him to stop contacting the campaign so much," said Sam Steelman, a spokesman for his mother's campaign. "The guy was making some pretty outstanding claims for someone we didn't know much about at all."

Online, Dustin Mitchell claims to be running for lieutenant governor in Missouri. But he never filed for the election and said in an email after his arrest that he is no longer seeking the office.

Online, Mitchell says he is president and CEO of Assurance Inc. and describes it as a 100-plus employee company that sells identity theft protection, personal security, printing solutions and precious metals.

Websites for Assurance list an address in an office building in Clayton that houses a Bank of America branch and bank offices, a law firm and a brokerage company. Workers interviewed on different floors said they had never heard of Assurance or Mitchell, except for getting occasional mail addressed to him. Assurance is a registered company in Missouri, but records show the firm dissolved in January.

In a brief interview, Mitchell said he used to rent an office in the building, but the payments became too expensive.

Mitchell told a reporter that he could explain it all. He arranged a place and time to meet up and tell his side of the story. But he never showed up at the agreed time early this month, and didn't return calls or emails.

About a week later, he went back to prison because the theft charge against him was a violation of his parole in a DWI case.


View the original article here

Carnival Triumph released to Sail after Deal struck, lawyer says-Businessweek

A Carnival Corp. (CCL) (CCL) cruise liner was released to sail of a Texas port by a U.S. judge who ordered that in the batter 30 March in a lawsuit over a death in the Costa Concordia shipwreck from Italy.

U.s. Magistrate Judge John Froeschner released the MS Carnival triumph yesterday from an order of the seizure the cruise liner keep in his home port of Galveston, said John Eaves Jr., a lawyer for the family of the victim.

The triumph, which is owned by the same company that owns the Costa Concordia, was wanted as security in a lawsuit (CCL) that was also placed on March 30 in Galveston Federal Court by the family of Siglinde Stumpf, a German tourist who died in the shipwreck.

"The issue related to the Carnival triumph is resolved," said Jennifer De La Cruz, a spokeswoman for Miami-based Carnival, the world's largest cruise ship operator.

The triumph was allowed to Board passengers and freight, while the seizure order in fact was. The 2,758-passenger ship offers year-round service from the Houston area to ports in the Caribbean and Mexico. It left about 4: 30 pm local time for a five-day trip to Yucatan and Cozumel.

Eaves said in a telephone interview earlier yesterday that the triumph could be freed from the seizure order as the cruise line agreed to a $ 10 million bond in safety of the German tourist lawsuit. Details of the resolution, which was achieved about 30 minutes before the scheduled time of departure, the ship shall be confidential, eaves said in an emailed statement.

Eaves, based in Jackson, Mississippi, said he is part of a movement of the international consumer lobby for more surveillance and safety standards in the global cruise industry. He said 16 cruise ships sunk worldwide in the last 20 years. At least 25 people died after the Costa Concordia ran hang from Italy in January.

Eaves said he served Stumpf the lawsuit in Galveston to focus on the triumph, what he said "the same inadequate safety standards as the Costa Concordia, exactly the same. ''

"We have not managed to get the attention of our Carnival, so this shot over the arc is to let them know that we are serious about changing the law and maritime standards are," said Eaves. "We want a uniform set of safety standards, and we will not stop until we get it."

Carnival said on March 9, had a net loss of $ 139 million in the first quarter, compared with net income of $ 152 million in the period last year.

Consequences of the shipwreck of the Costa Concordia, which ran aground off the Italian island of Giglio, will extend until 2012, the company said in a statement accompanying the release of the profit.

Carnival problems exacerbated when another Costa Cruises ship, Allegra, was towed to shore in the Seychelles Islands in the Indian Ocean after catching fire on 27 February and 22 guests on the Carnival splendor were deprived to land in Mexico.

The case is Kai Stumpf v. Carnival Plc, 3: 12-cv-0099, u.s. District Court, Southern District of Texas (Galveston).

To Contact the reporter on this story: Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston on laurel@calkins.us.com.

To Contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha on mhytha@bloomberg.net


View the original article here

The lawyer beside Lindsay Lohan

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

When Lindsay Lohan showed up for court on Thursday, the crowd was not as large as it has been for the actress — anticipating perhaps a resolution, rather than the sort of dramatic turn that's made her five-year legal saga as compelling as any TV reality show.

The 25-year-old Lohan has been in and out of jail and rehab so many times, her story line seemed to arc toward failure.

She blew off therapy and community service, ticked off counselors and judges. You never knew what to expect from her in the courtroom — a tearful plea, a pout, a fingernail painted with a vulgar taunt.

But one thing never seemed to change: the steady presence of lawyer Shawn Holley, who is as movie-star pretty as her client but has the gravitas to smooth Lohan's rough edges.

I've been pulling for Lohan from the beginning. She's a talented actress whose on-screen portrayals are an angsty mix of innocence and defiance. Her movies "Mean Girls" and "Freaky Friday" are classic favorites of my daughters.

But talk about bad role-modeling. As a fan, I found Lohan's missteps disappointing. As a mother, I found her jaunts exhausting. She became a symbol of the reckless self-absorption that's become routine for some young women — and I don't just mean Hollywood starlets.

As I watched her legal troubles mount — two DUIs and a jewelry theft — I took an odd sort of comfort from Holley's presence. They seemed to me more than client and lawyer.

When Lohan was sentenced to jail in 2010, she sobbed in the courtroom on Holley's shoulder. When Lohan was handcuffed in 2011, Holley looked down as her client was led out of court, as if the lawyer could not bear to watch.

On Thursday, Holley scribbled notes on her legal pad as the judge complimented Lohan's progress. She allowed herself the slightest smile when the judge pronounced Lohan's probation "terminated."

We witnessed the hug between Lohan and Holley. We didn't get to hear Lohan's whispered "I love you."

::

A few hours after Lohan was freed, I headed off to meet her lawyer. In my 30-minute drive, I heard the story of Lohan's court hearing three times on the radio. She was wearing a "tight-fitting blue pantsuit," one announcer intoned.

She wasn't. It was more like teal, and it was tailored and tasteful — conservative, if you're 25.

It seems we can't resist a dig, even on her most triumphant morning. That reflects our investment in her bad-girl persona. And that troubles Holley.

"Lindsay's incredibly strong, but she's also very fragile," Holley said. "I can't imagine what it must be like to be her and feel how much people are kind of waiting for your downfall. That's got to be difficult, hurtful. And she doesn't deserve it."

That's the celebrity lawyer speaking — but it's also the mother of a 9-year-old daughter, an attorney who got her start as a public defender, a woman who still remembers her own youthful misadventures.

"Let's just say I had fun," said Holley, who went to UCLA from Fairfax High, spent a year teaching English at Washington Prep, then enrolled at Southwestern Law School because she didn't know what to do with her life.

She'd spent lots of time around lawyers. Her mother — who was single and 19 when Holley was born — was a legal secretary who earned her MBA in night school and spent years managing law firms.

Holley got her legal start interviewing car thieves and crack addicts. "You walk into this [courtroom] holding tank, and it's hot and it stinks and it's nasty," she said. And no one understands their legal rights. Most were ready to plead guilty, she said, even if they had a legitimate defense.

"You start seeing that you're dealing with the concept of liberty in real life."


View the original article here